Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:14
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Do people have to be a pastor to baptize?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Which bands became massively popular for covering songs rather than recording originals?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Have you ever forcibly sucked someone’s dick?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Qualifying results: Shore Lunch 250 presented by Dutch Boy at Elko Speedway - arcaracing.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Which is the most liked web series in India?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why is my older sister so mean to me as if I was her enemy?
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How do schizophrenia symptoms change throughout the day?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Kroger announces 60 stores will shut down nation-wide - KIRO 7 News Seattle